Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:53:55 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
<5100F94423E14E6C9E53C0A869268EFF@owner454d9914d> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ron:
Once again, as noted in my most recent post, I log-in, using my account ID
and password, and still have problems, such as those I'm suggesting.
Again, sorry for not noting this earlier.
Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Canazzi" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: QRZ.com
> Hi Tom,
>
> When you enter the qrz page now, you are placed immediately into the
> callsign search box. Type in your callsign and press tab once for the
> search results. You will get very little. You have to log-in to get
> the detailed results you used to get in the past. Why this is I can't
> say--unless hams were complaining about SPAM originating from their
> presence on QRZ. That's just a guess. If you log-in then the results
> become available as they were in the past.
>
> On 8/23/2013 1:57 PM, Tom Behler wrote:
>> Hi, everyone.
>>
>> I was just looking up a call on qrz.com, and was dismayed to find the
>> search
>> function and resultant information for a given call is less accessible
>> than
>> it has ever been.
>>
>> It does not seem as easy to get to the QRZ look-up as it once was, and
>> even
>> when there, it is more difficult to access different pieces of
>> information
>> for a given call sign.
>>
>> I know that wm7d has been suggested as another alternative, and may now
>> start using that web site exclusively for call sign lookups.
>>
>> Has anyone had similar recent experience with qrz.com??
>>
>> I am using Jaws 13 and Windows XP on this particular computer.
>>
>> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>
>
|
|
|