BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:25:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Where is that old ham spirit Tom!!  How about mid-March?!!
Pat, K9JAUAt 10:22 AM 1/1/2014, you wrote:
>Howard:
>
>I think I'll have to back the RF gain down on the TS480 at least somewhat in
>order to effectively work with the noise bridge, based on my limited
>experience with the device and my TS590.  Adjusting the RF gain on the 480
>is, of course, a bit of a hassle, since you have to do it via the front
>panel keypad and function knob, rather than a simple single knob adjustment,
>but it is doable.  I seem to recall it is number 6, but will have to check
>the manual.
>
>In any case, I'm not going to go out into the RV today and try it, since
>temps are in the single digits, wind chills are below 0, and since I'd have
>to trudge through at least 12 inches of snow to get there.  (grin)
>
>Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
>Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 11:11 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: MFJ Noise Bridge Again
>
>Tom, you got it right!
>The minimum pulse is very accurate.  Any additional circuitry adds loss.
>I am not sure if you can just attenuate the signal while listening on the
>480, or if you will have to crank the rf gain back as well.
>
>
>---
>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
>protection is active.
>http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2