Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 3 Nov 2013 11:11:46 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Just to clarify, there is *NO* difference between the home and pro versions
of Jaws. The difference lies solely in the authorization key.
For home users, there generally isn't a big need to use a higher version of
Windows 7 than Home Premium. Obviously, businesses are a different animal;
and there are some power users who prefer Windows 7 Pro as opposed to Home.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Tillinghast" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: OTQ follow up
> Hi Ed,
> The saleperson that I talked to at FS said that there wasn't much of a
> difference with JAWS for the PRO version and the Home version. She said
> it
> was compatability. So they can charge more? Gary KB2YAA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 2:00 PM
> Subject: Re: OTQ follow up
>
>
>> What advantage is the pro over the home version? There is about 80.00
>> dollars difference in the s m a I think.
>> Ed K7UC
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Gary Tillinghast" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2013 11:45 AM
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: OTQ follow up
>>
>>> Hi all, Last week I asked about useing JAWS with Ultimate 64 bit as a OS
>>> under Windows 7. The Ultimate 64 bit is listed as a upgrade with the
>>> PRO
>>> version. The cost to upgrade JAWS would have been about $400 (200 for
>>> the
>>> JAWS upgrade and $200 for the SMA). I couldn't justify the cost, so we
>>> are
>>> downgrading the OS to Windows 7 Home Platinun version. One doesn't get
>>> many
>>> breaks with the FS group. So I hope the information can help anyone in
>>> the
>>> future. Gary KB2YAA
|
|
|