BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gary Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 May 2013 19:46:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
good job ron.  Had a 703+ once.  nice little rig.  Now have a kx3, even better performance.
When I get it back from a complete re-alignment and install of the ni-mh battery charger, going to play out on the patio with the alex loop walk-ham.  a portable mag loop which works really well from 40 through 10.


Gary Lee
[log in to unmask]



On May 11, 2013, at 3:13 AM, Ron Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> agreed, but my fist is really rusty.
> 
> Ron Miller
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Howard Kaufman
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 2:44 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Encouragement for apartment dwellers
> 
> I think Florida helps, but the 6 meter work is E skip, when its there, its
> there.  If you run CW, you multiply your effective signal by a factor of 10,
> because you can be  received in at least 1 tenth the band width.  a 5 4 9 CW
> signal can be quite readable.  If you live in an apartment, its certainly
> worth learning the code.  If you live in a house, its certainly fun and
> useful to learn the code as well.  I have never wanted to run power, and
> with CW I never have needed more than 100 watts. 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2241 / Virus Database: 3162/5815 - Release Date: 05/10/13

ATOM RSS1 RSS2