BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date:
Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:20:43 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Anoying radio Interference Issue
From:
Mike Barnard <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<1E.44.10505.AF347825@louvi-msg>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
NiceAt 05:08 AM 11/16/2013, you wrote:
>I wonder if they shared samples?  Better the hams than the feds even now
>that pot is legal in Colorado.
>
>Can you imagine, visiting a neighbor and he says,
>wanta beer, a joint and a dozen cookies!!
>
>
>---
>This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
>protection is active.
>http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2