Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:06:24 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
<B373C08BC24946B186EE8E574B44EDD4@BobsDell> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Howard,
I know that front loading washing machines are supposed to be the most
efficient, but I've heard from many friends that they just don't hold up as
good as the top loaders do. One of the guys that I talk to on 75 meters has
had three front loaders that all broke within one year. He's back to a top
loader now.
Bob, K8LR, [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: off topic
Thanks all. The AFB was helpful.
I didn't think much about the power and water savings, but at 8 loads a
week, they are talking about $300 a year. That is worth putting in to the
equation.
can you believe in the ADA guidelines their is not a word about speech or
low vision. Its all about one handed operation and access from a
wheelchair.
What are we? Chopped liver!!!!!
|
|
|