BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date:
Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:34:13 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Working or not working
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<006801cea670$4f5d0fd0$ee172f70$@com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
"Alan R. Downing" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
Good morning all,

 

My point was simply that it is not possible to declare an antenna as working
on the basis of such a limited data set.  There is an awful lot more
involved to just declare some antenna as working just because you were able
to carry on a local QSO, probably thru a repeater at that.

 

73

 

 

Alan R. Downing

Phoenix, AZ

 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2