BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:05:57 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<4C692C9D4E19400C8CF9433F77B6B46D@johnlt>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<F7.D2.25091.8BC02225@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Richard, I agree, we have to work with what we have most often.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 11:33 AM
Subject: antennas etc


> Hi;
> My unprofessional opinion is that if the swr is reasonable and one gets
> reasonable signal reports and there isn't a high noise level then the
> antenna works.  True I understand the pattern may be something other
> than the manufacturer intended but unless you have those three acres
> someone mentioned in an earlier post, antennas tend to come down to how
> much antenna can I do given the real estate at hand which is often
> inadequate.  The unfortunate part of all this is you really don't know
> how things are going to play until you put the thing up and give it a try.
> just my two cents
>
> -- 
> richard 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2