BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Fri, 9 Aug 2013 19:50:28 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<1F95DA5A14DC427A91C6D1259CDD99D3@n1umj71215edc0>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
They make them still.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Gammon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: Experience with Noise Bridges?


> Ok, thanks Howard, I appreciate your information.  Will have to 
> check with HRO to see if they even make them now.  73, Jim WA6EKS
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:29:33 -0500
> Subject: Re: Experience with Noise Bridges?
> 
> I used an old noise bridge 30 years ago.   It was very accurate 
> with a deep
> null at the resonant point.  You couldn't transmit through it and 
> it had RCA
> jacks.  I imagine they are better now.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2