BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:18:56 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: ts590
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<D7.40.10307.6CF04025@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From:
Butch Bussen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (12 lines) 
One thing I would recommend is the optional t x o for frequency stability. 
I think Kenwood made a big mistake in the way this has to be installed. 
You remove a small board from the rig and solder the optional t c x o onto 
this board.  If you want this, it would cost extra, but well worth it in 
my opinion.  I don't recall what the t c x o cost, $90 I think.  That rig 
is absolutely rock stable now.
73
Butch
WA0VJR
Node 3148
Wallace, ks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2