BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:04:55 -0700
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Man Kelvin, you mean you couldn't hear my 100 watt signal through 
my dipole at 35 feet from CA.  I think you need a better 
receiver! Only kidding of course.  Well, maybe in the winter 
things will improve, however, I have not had enough summer 
weather yet so am very content to wait.  73, Jim WA6EKS

 ----- Original Message -----
From: Kelvin Marsh <[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Date sent: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:51:34 +0100
Subject: 20M Net

Hi All,

Best conditions for me so far, and no QRM to speak of!  I heard 
the
following stations here in England.  Apologies if I've mis-heard 
callsigns.
The weaker signals I'll just give a Readability signal.

W3IUU 57 from the back of Lloyd's beam.
KG4ITD R3
W9DIK R2
K0HAZ R3 QSB
AC2KS R3 QSB
W8QIY 58
John Arizona R1
Denver R0
KB2CBU R2
WD8INW/P R0
KW3A 57
WA0VJR 46 on original mike and 56 when mike was changed

Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID

Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with 
disabilities

www.active-elements.org

For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 
manuals

ATOM RSS1 RSS2