BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 May 2013 20:05:48 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<E5.E6.10307.B66DE815@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Fred Adams <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
To me, the P200 is more simple and stable.  Also, very dependable.  A
technician checked out the P2000 for me with a Byrd watt meter and told me
that he didn't think I could find a better one for me.  I have tried the
TW1 several time but I just do not like it.  If I had never used the P2000
and used the TW1 from the start I am sure I would like it much better.  If
a new one comes out and I can afford it, I'll give it a try.  One reason I
like the p2000 might be because I like hearing everything read out in CW.

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Dave Marthouse
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Audible s w r/p w r meter

Hi Fred,

Just out of curiosity why don't you like the TW1?



Dave Marthouse N2AAM
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2