Jeff

What may seem as a lame excuse to you or me may not appear so to the 
developer.  Keep in mind that each individual, to a situation, brings 
their own perspectives and values; and while to you or me, it may appear 
straightforward, it may not appear that to someone else.
When that individual or business initially created something, they were 
not thinking about specific cases such as the handicapped, or, in most 
instances, other specific groups or situations.
They weren't thinking about eliminating or discriminating their idea or 
product from some group or audience.
They were thinking about whatever they were developing -- and that's it.
If it worked -- or did not work for someone or something -- was hardly on 
their radar. 

And, if we legally began forcing these thought restrictions -- if that 
were even practically possible (which it isn't) -- the ultimate impact 
would be to stifle creativity.
And that, in society, is exactly what is happening in many venues.  For 
instance, in some fields and locales, it is so difficult -- or one has to 
jump through so many hoops -- that people or firms are not taking business 
ideas or concepts and putting them into action.
Remember, when you create something and seek to profit from it, you take 
on a risk and if that risk is not be rewareded -- or is made so difficult 
to succeed -- one will choose not to proceed.
That, for example, is why in capitalistic economies there is far greater 
innovation than say in the old Soviet Union.
And we are losing that in the US with the complexities and burdens of the 
tax code, EPA regulations, all sorts of laws that the average individual 
just doesn't know about, and all the rest.
Accessability may be important to you and me -- because we live in that; 
but, for example, do you or I understand the world of the Kansas wheat 
farmer or the guy fixing vehicles in Fort Worth or Sacramento?
You may want to sell something out of your home -- and I may want to 
purchase it from you -- but 3rd parties may step in the way, interfere if 
they suddenly discover your selling or offering something, et al.

If you or I developed a software program or device, or just came up with 
an idea which actually worked in solving something or someone, we hardly 
could envision its impact on 3rd parties that aren't on our radar scope.  

And please, no one tell me that I had to because it was in some law -- 
perhaps even one not related to anything -- so I had to have been aware of 
it.
My role, as a creator is to do just that -- not to anticipate consequences 
to anyone or everyone.
When you do that -- and that's what's happening in 21st century America -- 
you ultimately kill the goose that lays the golden egg. 

Free enterprise and capitalism ultimately works -- if you allow it to do 
so.  It starts stalling when we throw in too many "catch yous" -- even if 
those may initially have been made into the mix with the best of initial 
intentions.

We, as blind consumers, ultimately make out best if the marketplace is 
allowed to do its thing in its own way.  Yes, you or I may not then be 
able to avail ourselves of every gadget, gismo or thing that comes along; 
but, then on the other hand, there will come other things that might serve 
you or my purposes even better if they are allowed to see the light of day 
without a high level of government interference. 

I rather live in that kind of environment which is one that flourished not 
all that long ago rather than in today's nanny state where I am supposedly 
protected from everything and ultimately benefit from less and less 
because of its being stifled. 

So that company or individual may wish to protect their proprietary 
development because of their economic or other interest; but, on the other 
hand, if you can demonstrate to them how your being taken into their 
circle will benefit both you and them, then everyone ultimately benefits. 

These days, we are too much focused on rights rather than opportunity.  
The playing field is never equal, nor can it be nor should it be.  Forced 
equality guarantees only mediocrity at best -- and probably a lot worse.





Kindness has converted more sinners than zeal, eloquence, or learning.
Frederick W Faber, 19th century English hymn writer and theologian


On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Jeff Kenyon wrote:

> >> 
> >> Sometimes the trick is trying to convince people that technology is adaptable.
> 
> Believe it or not I was able to use some touchscreen equipment without any audio assistance back in the mid-80s. It was mainly audio equipment.
> 
> Another excuse the comes across from some people is that programs are proprietary and they don't want to run the risk of somebody from the outside getting a hold of the programming language. In my opinion, that's just a lame excuse.
> 
>     VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
> Archived on the World Wide Web at
>     http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
>     Signoff: [log in to unmask]
>     Subscribe: [log in to unmask]
> 


    VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
Archived on the World Wide Web at
    http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html
    Signoff: [log in to unmask]
    Subscribe: [log in to unmask]