Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:18:08 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
<D1F578BB6C34455DA525D63FBEDAD7F1@ToshibaLaptop1> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom,
The last time I used QRZ I had the same problem. This was probably a couple
of months ago. I try not to use it.
Howard #3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:57 PM
Subject: QRZ.com
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I was just looking up a call on qrz.com, and was dismayed to find the
> search
> function and resultant information for a given call is less accessible
> than
> it has ever been.
>
> It does not seem as easy to get to the QRZ look-up as it once was, and
> even
> when there, it is more difficult to access different pieces of information
> for a given call sign.
>
> I know that wm7d has been suggested as another alternative, and may now
> start using that web site exclusively for call sign lookups.
>
> Has anyone had similar recent experience with qrz.com??
>
> I am using Jaws 13 and Windows XP on this particular computer.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
|
|
|