BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:40:35 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<5CCF55AB92414FA08A293A09C7C05359@harvey0b9e4842>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Harvey Heagy <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I also had one of those Webster Echotape machines.  It produced pretty good 
recordings, but mine didn't have the 1 and 7 eighths speed.  And the largest 
reel it would take was a 7 inch reel.  So you probably had a different model 
than I had.  But that recorder lasted me 15 years or so.
Harvey
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Martin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Happy birthday Cassette Tape


> When I went to college, The Lions Club bought me a Webster Electric Echo
> Tape machine.  It used reels from about 3 inches to about 9 inches.  The
> larger tape would play 1 hour on each side at slowest speed but had to use
> fast speed to get any frequency response for music and that wasn't even 
> high
> fidelity. I repaired broken tape with a special splicing tape but could 
> use
> regular Scotch tape in a pinch.
>
> bob 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2