ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:57:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (238 lines)
All right, I suspect you know more about Edgar casiie than I.  I was 
speaking from the fact his organization has a large edifice in Virginia 
beach.  Engaging people to speak to such groups as the Theosophic societies 
around the country.  Whatever I say, you all will read and believe what you 
want to believe in any case.  It really makes no difference to me in the 
end.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: Just read the book


> Angel,
>
> I am familiar with the beliefs, and many of the writings, which I have 
> read over the years, of each and every person you mentioned but I have 
> read the Bible from cover to cover 115 times.  I have read way more in the 
> cults and occults than just the authors you mentioned, in order to 
> understand their beliefs.  I am not afraid of what they say or believe.  I 
> have worked in counseling prayer sessions with many demonized people but 
> the Bible says the demons believe more than some of His own children do. 
> By the way, you are incorrect about Edgar Casie.  He refused to take money 
> from people and died a very poor man and his family suffered.  I never 
> asked for a dime over the 10 years I did prayer counseling and my family 
> suffered but I don't believe a thing Edgar Casie did or said.  You speak 
> with many words to try and overcome the beliefs of others but your fear 
> exposes your true beliefs.
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Angel" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Just read the book
>
>
>>I am not hiring this author to write anything for me.  If I were, I 
>>wouldn't be commissioning him.  My Church does not contradict this.  There 
>>are many writings I will not read for various reasons, and many authors 
>>whom I don't admire. Whom others do for their own reasons.  The writings 
>>of Edgar Casie is among these.  Neither have I read the "Watch
>> Tower".  Each of whom have lots of people who read them, and steadfastly 
>> believe them, and contribute to the material wealth of the organizations 
>> begun by their founders.  Many people have encouraged me to read them 
>> too. I still haven't read them.  I don't read the works of Elrond 
>> Hubbard.  I didn't even read those he wrote which didn't directly concern 
>> scientology,. Nor have I read the writings of Misses Mary Baker Eddy. 
>> For the same reasons.  I wouldn't hire any of them to write anything for 
>> me either. Also, for the same reasons.  At the risk of being accused of 
>> judging:  I will just bet you haven't read these authors either.  Why is 
>> this I ask? Because, and here, I shall make another judgment, you perhaps 
>> feel as I do, their works are nothing but claptrap.  Are these writers 
>> worthy of their hire?  There are those who feel they are, and then there 
>> is I, along with others, who feel they aren't.  Which is why we don't 
>> read them.  I can judge motives.  If we didn't judge motives no one would 
>> be a success in this world.  Had Eve judged more carefully the possible 
>> motivation behind her temptation, there might not have been a reason for 
>> Jesus to have left his heavenly realm.  If we aren't to judge motives, 
>> how can we judge the various spirits which might tempt us.  Jesus judged 
>> correctly satans motivation and resisted his tempting.  If Sampson had 
>> judged properly the motives behind Delilah he would also have been better 
>> off.  Character is formed from the ability to judge motivations of those 
>> whom we encounter.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 8:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: Just read the book
>>
>>
>>>    Angel,
>>>
>>> You are back to judging others motives now?  How do you gain such 
>>> insight
>>> without reading their works and publications?  Why are you opposed when
>>> Jesus said a workman is worthy of his hire?  Don't you believe the words 
>>> of
>>> Jesus or do you believe your church instead?
>>>
>>> Phil.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Angel" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 5:44 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Just read the book
>>>
>>>
>>>> Yes I am going to continue to question the motivations of anyone who
>>>> writes a religious book and makes more money than did those who wrote 
>>>> the
>>>> original Greek and Hebrew scriptures.  Or who makes more money from 
>>>> what
>>>> it is they write than did our Lord who walked this earth.  Because I 
>>>> think
>>>> their basic motivation is economic gain.  I am sure economic gain was 
>>>> not
>>>> the basic motivation of the biblical authors.  As for Catholics of all
>>>> three branches of the Faith, I can't control what it is they read.  I
>>>> disagree with many who practice many things.  I don't object to the
>>>> reading of most literature, or what passes for literature these days, 
>>>> for
>>>> any reason.  But, when possible contrivance passes itself as fact, and 
>>>> is
>>>> believed as such. As in stigmata, for example. I feel the need to
>>>> criticize.  I have read many texts from various non Christian 
>>>> religions.
>>>> Whose authors had what I suspect are purer motives, and I disbelieve 
>>>> their
>>>> content equally.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:22 PM
>>>> Subject: Just read the book
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Angel,
>>>>>
>>>>> What are you going to do with all the Catholics who read this little
>>>>> book, filled with Biblical and Scriptural confirmations, and believe 
>>>>> the
>>>>> stories are true and Biblical?  Are you going to still keep belittling
>>>>> the family for making money or being paid for their labors.  Read the
>>>>> book, not a review.  Read the book and then come back and tell us all 
>>>>> the
>>>>> Biblical references used by the pastor are incorrect and taken out of
>>>>> context.  A lot of Catholics have already read this book and believe 
>>>>> it
>>>>> is real.  You haven't read it and still say it isn't real nor are we 
>>>>> real
>>>>> for believing it's true.  I still think you are just plane afraid to 
>>>>> read
>>>>> it for fear of what you will find.
>>>>>
>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Angel" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:18 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Angel, Please first read Heaven is for real: a little 
>>>>> boy's
>>>>> astounding story of his trip to heaven and back.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I read a review of the film which sprang from the book.  The review 
>>>>>>says
>>>>>>the book is basically a father's permission for the telling and the
>>>>>>writing of this event.  How much input did the father have in any
>>>>>>possible altering of the Childs experiences to sell the book and the
>>>>>>film?  How much money is being made resulting from both the book and
>>>>>>film?  How much notoriety are both the child and his father to receive
>>>>>>from the sales of these commercial products?  Verses, how much of the
>>>>>>above were made by the apostles. Considering their stories were 
>>>>>>codified
>>>>>>at least a century and a half following the death of our Lord, and not
>>>>>>one of the apostles made a cent from the telling of their stories. 
>>>>>>All
>>>>>>of which I believe.  I am wondering why more of you aren't more 
>>>>>>skeptical
>>>>>>than you all seem to be. In view of the above.  I am sure, if I came 
>>>>>>out
>>>>>>with some book maintaining I had such an experience, many would ask
>>>>>>about, and would wonder about the same things before they even 
>>>>>>attempted
>>>>>>to believe my claims.  I dare say many might even be on this list.  My
>>>>>>Faith being different than  is your Faith might be a beginning point 
>>>>>>from
>>>>>>which your skepticism might spring. It would perhaps proceed from 
>>>>>>there.
>>>>>>Just some other things to ponder when reading the book.  Or while 
>>>>>>viewing
>>>>>>the film.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>> From: "Karen Carter" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:10 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Angel, Please first read Heaven is for real: a little 
>>>>>> boy's
>>>>>> astounding story of his trip to heaven and back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree Donna
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 5:56 AM, Donna Bell <[log in to unmask]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>> I haven't read the book yet, but I intend too.  My first  reaction 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> what I'm reading is that this family needs our prayers, and
>>>>>>> compassion.
>>>>>>> Any book that talks  about miracles should be weighed against
>>>>>>> scripture,
>>>>>>> but it seems like what happened to this little one is meant  to
>>>>>>> encourage us.
>>>>>>> I haven't  walked on water, or raised the dead,  but God has saved 
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> life more than once, and the testimonies from these events have lead
>>>>>>> people to salvation,  which is what really matters.
>>>>>>> We'll know the book by it's fruit.  Angel, I'm  sorry you seem so
>>>>>>> angry.
>>>>>>> Blessings,
>>>>>>> Donna
>>>>>>>> On 7/23/14, Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Then tell us everything that is theologically wrong with this
>>>>>>>> miraculous
>>>>>>>> experience.  I get the feeling you don't want to read this little 
>>>>>>>> book
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> I'm wondering why.  Why do you want to argue what you believe when 
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> haven't read this book of a little boy's testimony confirmed by
>>>>>>>> Scripture
>>>>>>>> from beginning to end.  Are you worried it might challenge some of
>>>>>>>> your most
>>>>>>>> closely held beliefs?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Phil.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2