Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:59:51 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
wow! since when does bard have any more mags that are worth reading??? i will have o go look right now!
On Jun 16, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Russell Schermer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In the December 2012 issue of Popular Communications there is an article by
> Gordon West wb6noa about a system that uses RFID tags and a 220 mHz receiver
> for locating pets. Because its an RF transmitter it sends out a signal
> whether the cat moves or not. You should be able to download that issue from
> BARD to get more information.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Jim Gammon
> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 2:56 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: CatsNDogs
>
> That's why I don't like most cats, cause they don't act like dogs and their
> claws are much sharper! Jim WA6EKS
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date sent: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:40:28 -0500
> Subject: radio but not ham radio
>
> I sat outside for five hours yesterday morning listening for escaped cats.
> They know if they get out, that I can't find them if they don't move. Well,
> that left me plenty of time to think. I have never seen one of those key
> finder things, where you have one device that makes a noise, and a remote
> that activates it. So is the receiver to heavy for a cat collar?
> Wouldn't
> the cats be surprised to make noises when they didn't move? Is this idea
> pheasible with out being inhumane?
>
> You know they are sitting stock still a foot and a half out of my reach;
> laughing their heads off at me.
>
>
> H T Kaufman MSW LCSW
> Adaptive Technology Instructor
|
|
|