BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Forst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 May 2013 20:27:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Howard,

I'm far from a Jaws guru, but hit insert-f2, then arrow down to 
"graphics labeler".   Maybe this is what you want.

73, Steve KW3A

On 5/3/2013 8:22 PM, Howard Kaufman wrote:
> I installed a copy of Jaws today, and their is a "getting started wizard".
> I found some of the options in the Jaws configuration menus, including what
> to do with mixed case words, and how many characters long a word had to be
> done with.
> My question is their was an option of how to handle unlabeled graphics.
> Jaws by default gives the graphics numbers, and this feature can be turned
> off.
> My question is,
> After Jaws is installed, how do I run the wizard again?
> Jaws also has very clever options to handle ribbon bars.  I wonder how well
> they work?
> I am using office 2003 here, because I don't want the headaches.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 7:11 PM
> Subject: Re: JAWS 14.0.1823 and Call signs
>
>
>> Yes, now that you mention it.  I had noticed this in my Writelog
>> contesting software, and since I had updated  Writelog recently, I
>> assumed that was the problem.  Am also on Jaws 14.0.1823.  Unless or
>> until this gets figured out, I may just load an older version of Jaws
>> for contests.   This is the only place I've noticed the problem.
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>
>> On 5/3/2013 7:21 PM, Blake Hailey wrote:
>>> I have noticed in the latest release that JAWS speaks mixed case
>>> processing
>>> differently.  For example My call KA5POW now Sounds like KA5POW K.  Is
>>> anyone else having this problem?
>>>
>>> Blake KA5POW
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Blake
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2