BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:38:05 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<B17A1AC68CC74773B4D7015E80C6A68A@JimGammonPC>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<B5.D7.00785.38BAA715@louvi-msg>
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Jim Gammon <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi Dave, yes you are right, and back then, you, or at least I, didn't have 
that much of a problem deciding which crystal pairs to install.  There 
weren't that many repeaters around.  The C model had 12 channels where the 
straight TR22 had six I think.    I remember when the synthesized rigs 
started coming out.  Even then, I started being concerned about how that 
would change the QSO environment on our club repeater.  It did, but not 
necessarily for the worse.  73, Jim


-----Original Message----- 
From: Dave Marthouse
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:29 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old Gear

Hi Jim,

You had the C.  I had the rig before that which was the original TR22.  It
was built like a tank with it's all metal construction.  Heaven forbid if
you dropped it on your foot.  Hihi!

Dave Marthouse N2AAM
[log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2