BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bob Martin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:38:37 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1039862046=="
Reply-To:
Bob Martin <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1591 bytes)
Hi' Colin;
Seriously, What did I miss?  I don't know the topics about which Robert is making reference.
73
Bob Martin
kc3fiOn Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:54:59 -0600, Colin McDonald wrote:


>ah well, at least there are occasional nuggits that are worth sticking 
>around for.
>I think Phil has stated and restated his idea of what the list should be 
>about, and it's pretty much following those guidelines.
>
>73
>Colin, V A6BKX
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Robert C" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:16 PM
>Subject: Signing off...again
>
>
>>Well, I am once again leaving the list for the vast majority of the
>>posts are off topic. If people are comfortable with this, so be it. But
>>its a damn shame for there are some of you who have a lot to offer when
>>it comes to ham radio (the name of the list is BLIND HAMS but maybe its
>>time to go with the flow and change it to something else). So rather
>>than press the delete key with no end in sight, I shall just bail out.
>>As a ham radio op, its pointless to be on this list.
>>
>>Quote of the nanosecond . . .
>>Oxymoron: Entertaining sermon
>>Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
>>E-mail-
>>[log in to unmask] 


ATOM RSS1 RSS2