BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Aimee Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:28:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Actually I think it was the other way around.  I played around with both
sites before the merger too, and I found the Serius site to be a little more
workable.

73

Aimee Lewis
KK4JHF
"Be well, do good work and keep in touch." (Garrison Keillor)

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Miller
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question

Yeah, that's what I remember, I haven't checked after the merger and I don't

even think I've been to the web site more than once since then so it 
probably has changed. As I recall, serius always had a major issue with 
accessibility on their site and XM didn't.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question


>A lot of things are different since the merger of Sirius and XM.  At one
> time on the XM service you could click the link for the channel you wanted
> to listen to and that was it.
> Harvey
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:59 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Sirius-XM question
>
>
>> Their online player used to be accessible when they offered it free a few
>> years ago but since they went back to the pay system, I haven't tried it
>> and
>> that's been a while. It was nice when it was free though, I had no 
>> problem
>> with it, or very little. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2