BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jose Tamayo (KK4JZX)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 12:34:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
I have a question Ron, :

Example:  Olympus Ds-50:  Well, a blind person would not purchas an Olympus
Ds-50 if it were not accessible.  Reading the regulations, I found that a
blind person must be registered with the Postal Service as being blind in
order to have this service available.  So, I wonder if registering for this
service and purchasing products  that are specifically geared to the blind
would allow for the  rule to be used.  The postal service should have no
issue with a device that is sent specifically to a blind person that is
registerd with the local post office as such.  One might argue otherwise,
but would the service be available in that case?

I have another question:  What if the Olympus DS-50 is packaged with  a USB
flash card that contains an audio file with instructions?  Or what if the
device is included with a Braille instruction booklet?  Would that allow the
sender to use the FREE MATTER FOR THE BLIND option.

Ron, I want yoyou to know that I am  not trying to argue:  I just want to
check what the options might be.

Regards,

Jose - KK4JZX


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Ronald E. Milliman
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Old keyer available

A keyer is absolutely not eligible to be mailed as "Free Matter for the
Blind."  It is not made specifically for a blind person and does not fit
within either the letter or spirit of the postal regulations. Knowingly
misusing the "Free Matter for the Blind," privilege is both unethical and
illegal.  

As the President of the South Central Kentucky Council of the Blind, I have
studied the postal regulations quite closely and even conferred with the
postal authorities to be sure I understood the regulations before we used
the "Free Matter for the Blind" stamped on our mailings and shipments going
to our members, mailing materials to doctors' offices, etc.  Believe it or
not, the postal inspectors will and do inspect some mailings and shipments
to be sure they are not in violation of the postal regulations.  No, they do
not inspect everything that is sent as "Free Matter for the Blind," but they
will check anything that looks even a little suspicious.  

To use the "Free Matter for the Blind" mailing privilege, your item must be
specifically for a legally blind person or persons and includes Braille and
large print matter and devices designed for the specific use of blind
people.  A Victor Reader Stream can be sent as "Free Matter for the Blind,"
but an Olympus DS-50, which has speech built into it, cannot be sent as
"Free Matter for the Blind" because the Olympus DS-50 was not designed
specifically for the blind; though, it can certainly be used by the blind.
In like manner, all of the Apple products, e.g. iPhone Apple TV, etc.
cannot be shipped as "Free Matter for the Blind," even though they all have
Voiceover built into them and can be used by a blind person.  

Ron M.


Dr. Ronald E. Milliman, retired Professor Western Kentucky University

Chair, American Council of the Blind Public Relations Committee Monthly
Monetary Support Program (MMS) Committee

ATOM RSS1 RSS2