Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:57:49 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
I do not think that will happen because by law advertisements cannot be included in anything NLS produces.
Also Kindle does not have total accessibility. Some kindle every-books can be read with the Apple App.
If the platforms used for publications were made accessible we could access any publication we wish to read.
I for one would like to be able to read Materials put out by Exceptional Parent.
Colleen Roth, N8TNV;
----- Original Message -----
From: Russ Kiehne <[log in to unmask]>
,to3 [log in to unmask]
Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:04 am
Subject: Re: qst
>
>
> It would be nice if the ARRL would make QST available through the Kindle
> store.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: COLLEEN ROTH
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:01 AM
@> ,to3 [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: qst
>
> Hello,
> Handihams just gives a synopsis of some of the articles.
> Bard reads some of the articles but doesn't read Advertisements because it
> is against Federal Law to do so.
> Bard also does not read some of the standings for contests.
> I do not believe that Hamfest Schedule is read either.
> The problem with QST in Digital format is that the platform used to produce
> it is not accessible with screenreaders.
> Colleen Roth, N8TNV;
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
@> 1to#c [log in to unmask]
> Date: Monday, July 15, 2013 10:05 am
> Subject: qst
>
> >
> >
> > Hi;
> > A couple trivia questions. Firstly, I occasionally read qst primarily
> > from nls because it is simple to move around using daisy. Although it
> > is on nls and handihams reads it, nls leaves adds and other items that
> > are probably of more interest than the articles out. I wonder if the
> > digital version is 100% the same as the printed version or do they too
> > omit some things? Finally although I haven't investigated, since this
> > magazine is on line courtesy of arrl what is the hang up with
> > downloading and reading? Do they use scanned images, to many graphics
> > or where do we run into a problem? It seems more than a bit repetitive
> > to have three organizations trying to produce some form of an accessible
> > magazine.
> > Thanks
> >
> > thé"
> > richard
|
|
|