BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:27:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Thanks John.  Very helpful.
PatAt 01:54 PM 11/18/2012, you wrote:
>I run the LDG AT200pro with my station now that I"m in MARS, it's much
>better than the internal tuner and one thing I like is I have it set so if
>it sees anything over 1.6:1 SWR, it will automatically tune it, I don't even
>have to touch the tuner and in fact never do touch it, it does everything
>all on it's own and has memories so it can go straight to the setting it had
>last time you were on or near that frequency. I'm not sure I'd ever go back
>to an internal tuner, maybe for a temporary setup or something but my every
>day setup, nope.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:57 PM
>Subject: LDG at600 PRO
>
>
> > Have you any epxerience with the tuner in the subject line?  Cheapham
> > is selling them out at $249 and perhaps I need one!  I am guessing
> > that their range is wider and their tuning more precise and less
> > lossy than internal tuners.  Perhaps not as good as a remote tuner
> > where the coaxes leave the house, but perhaps a decent second.
> > I value your opinions.
> > Thanks.
> > Pat, K9JAU

ATOM RSS1 RSS2