BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:34:12 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: I am back
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<B9880B43B9E647F4BCB70747DD9D463A@newdell>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Steve <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Better check your SWR first, Howard.  It might be rolling back because of 
that; most compromised antennas have a very narrow bandwidth on the long 
wave band.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: I am back


> The radio has 43 watts out on 160, even though the power level says 100. 
> We
> are hoping probably that it is a software problem.  Going to see before
> packing it up and sending it away.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2