BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:06:48 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: H.F vertical recommendations and suggestions needed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<86A59867F2A54350A8C4EAFAB6BF754D@LowellDell>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
From:
Lowell Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
Hi Don,
Well, I have been using the Butternut antenna for over 12 years with good 
success.
I have the HF9 plus I have added the 160 coil at the bottom.
It does well with DX but not as good as a dipole for short hops.
I only wish I had room enough for a 75 meter dipole.
I have about 500 feet of radials under it as well.
I would consider this one if were you.
If you have more questions, just ask!
Best 73.
Lowell  W8QIY
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Risavy, Jr.; NR4DR" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 10:18 PM
Subject: H.F vertical recommendations and suggestions needed


> Was interested in some good low cost recommendations and or suggestions 
> for
> h.f verticals either with or without needing radials?
>
> Tnx cull 73 nr4dr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6163 - Release Date: 03/10/13
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2