BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Date:
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:49:07 -0600
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Short trapped verticals VS 33/43 Unon traples verticals
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<9411233FFF11444FB9F8E31F5A79E385@hkhome>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Howard Kaufman <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 lines) 
Which ever you like.  Non-trap antennas are broader in band width.  The real 
secret is the 32 radials.
If you have room for that, why not put up an inverted Vee and save lots of 
money?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2