Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:39:41 -0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<B2.F3.17653.1EB67015@louvi-msg> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Chad,
Go to the page and you'll find my text describing the antennas, As you
read, I have included links to each of the MP3 comparisons on each band.
BTW, there is another comparison page for a 6 metre high vertical using a 9
to un-un on the Active Elements site.
Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID
Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with disabilities
www.active-elements.org
For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of chad morrison
Sent: 29 January 2013 06:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Inverted L comparison
could someone please tell me how to listen?
Thanks so much
KB9TZR
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelvin Marsh" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:15 PM
Subject: Inverted L comparison
> Hi All,
>
> I've posted an audio comparison of the trapped inverted L antenna against
> my
> other aerials at:
>
>
http://active-elements.org/2013/01/28/hf-inverted-l-dipole-and-yagi-mp3-comp
> arison/
>
> It's not very scientific, and only compares RX, but it is interesting to
> hear the difference between vertical and horizontal polarization, and a
> homebrew antenna costing less than the run of coax against a 3 element
> Steppir.
>
> Best wishes, Kelvin Marsh - M0AID
>
> Working to improve accessibility for radio amateurs with disabilities
>
> www.active-elements.org
>
> For accessibility evaluations of amateur equipment and MP3 manuals
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2639/6058 - Release Date: 01/25/13
|
|
|