I think people are quite careful about using the "off topic" subject where 
appropriate.  So, dividing the posts from Blind Hams, by the number of posts 
with off topic in the sub    ject line, you will find that less than 10 per 
cent per week are off topic.

This is not a majority.  It may be to many for your satisfaction, but the 
statement is statistically inaccureate, and therefore "highly illogical".

Robert, I hate to see you go.  I apologize if it is partially my fault.  I 
don't mind off topic posts, and I appreciate the bright minds on this list. 
Hams are usually very helpful people.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: Signing off...again


> GOODBYE!!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Robert C
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Signing off...again
>
> Well, I am once again leaving the list for the vast majority of the
> posts are off topic. If people are comfortable with this, so be it. But 
> its
> a damn shame for there are some of you who have a lot to offer when it
> comes to ham radio (the name of the list is BLIND HAMS but maybe its time
> to go with the flow and change it to something else). So rather than press
> the delete key with no end in sight, I shall just bail out.
> As a ham radio op, its pointless to be on this list.
>
> Quote of the nanosecond . . .
> Oxymoron: Entertaining sermon
> Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
> E-mail-
> [log in to unmask]