 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original |
| Date: |
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:54:59 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
<ED9389B04AA14FDEA102A81741FB7FF3@ROWAN> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
ah well, at least there are occasional nuggits that are worth sticking
around for.
I think Phil has stated and restated his idea of what the list should be
about, and it's pretty much following those guidelines.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert C" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:16 PM
Subject: Signing off...again
> Well, I am once again leaving the list for the vast majority of the
> posts are off topic. If people are comfortable with this, so be it. But
> its a damn shame for there are some of you who have a lot to offer when
> it comes to ham radio (the name of the list is BLIND HAMS but maybe its
> time to go with the flow and change it to something else). So rather
> than press the delete key with no end in sight, I shall just bail out.
> As a ham radio op, its pointless to be on this list.
>
> Quote of the nanosecond . . .
> Oxymoron: Entertaining sermon
> Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
> E-mail-
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
