BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Jul 2012 20:43:12 -0700
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Doug Payne <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
NO, I have RP; I can no longer see well enough to red a waterfall display.

I heard of one digital mode package (I can't remember which one), which had
a waterfall display, but you could move from signal to signal by pressing a
hotkey. I thought I might get lucky with this package. Probably not, but you
never know until you try.

--Doug AC7T


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Michael Thurman
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?

wow I would  not have even looked at that program since the other jt = stuff
I tried was completely inaccessible... or are you one of the lucky = ones
whoare partial and can see enough with magnificaiton and a huge = screen?

On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:55 PM, Doug Payne wrote:

> Lou is correct.I didn't know it was used on HF either,  until I read =
the
> article in May QST. It certainly seems promising. It makes me wonder =
about
> the differences between JT65 and JT65-HF. The software author says it 
> =
is
> JT65 tweaked for use on HF, but doesn't go into details.
>=20
> I'll play around with this sometime this week and let you all know =
what I
> discover.
> --Doug, AC7T
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators =
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Lou Kolb
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>=20
> Jt65 is like psk31 in that it's another digital mode.  I've never had 
>=
any
> experience with it but the word is it can detect signals inaudible to 
> =
the
> human ear.  Signals that are well below the noise level.  I hadn't =
known
> that there was an HF version of it.  Usually, it's used on VHF for =
moon
> bounce work.
> Lou Kolb
> Voice-over Artist:
> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
> Messages On-hold:
> www.loukolb.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>=20
>=20
>> Hi Doug,
>> What is Jt-65?
>> Is that like psk31?
>> They say with psk31, even the weakest stations are heard!
>> Trippy, ac8s
>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>> From: Doug Payne=3D20
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 10:49 PM
>> Subject: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>>=20
>>=20
>> Hi Fellow-Listers,
>>=20
>> =3D20
>>=20
>> Have any of you had success using the JT65-HF software? I just read 
>>a=20=

>> =3D short  article about this mode in May 2012 QST, and it sounds =
like I=20
>> may be =3D able to  use this mode effectively, even with my modest 
>> HF=20=

>> setup. Of course, =3D that  depends on the accessibilty of the =
software,=20
>> among other things. I am  interested in hearing your experiences.=20  
>>Thanks.
>>=20
>> =3D20
>>=20
>> --Doug, AC7T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2