'Not even in Cold War?s darkest days': International law scrapped in
anti-Assange crusade

Published: 16 August, 2012, 23:46

Ecuador?s move to grant Julian Assange political asylum has shown the
true face of the current world order, highlighting more clearly than
ever the line between the American Empire and the rest of the world,
former CIA officer Ray McGovern told RT.

RT: One of the main reasons Ecuador cited for granting asylum was not
the Swedish case against Assange, but the danger of him being
persecuted and possibly even executed in the US. What reaction from
Washington do you expect?

Ray McGovern: Well, this is a classic case of what has changed over
the last 20 years. And that is simply that the shape of the world is
now empire vs. the rest of you. What I say here now is that Caesar has
spoken. Caesar is the law. Caesar is the United States and the satraps
overseas ? the UK in the first instance, and now Sweden in the other,
do the bidding of the empire. The country that has refused to do the
bidding of the empire, Ecuador, is playing a very interesting role
here. Their foreign minister said this morning that "we are not a
British colony, and the days of colonialism are over.

So what we see here is a playing out of the fact that there is a
complete disrespect for international law. The embassy premises of all
countries have heretofore been considered sacrosanct. The British
Foreign Office is now saying ?well, we may forcibly enter.? This was
unheard of even during the worst days of the Cold War. If someone
sought refuge in the US Embassy in Moscow or the Soviet Embassy in the
United States, despite the friction, despite the enmity between those
two countries, international law was always honored. This is
unprecedented.

RT: According to Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patina, the UK?s
acts of aggression, blackmailing, and threats are in direct violation
of the 1976 Council of Diplomatic Relations. Do you think that as
London and Washington are in cahoots, Ecuador is considered to be
meaningless, as it has a small military, and is not a significant
economic power?

RM: Well, that has been the attitude. Smaller countries do not really
amount to much in Washington or London?s view these days. What will be
interesting is to see how much will come out in terms of the real game
being played here. Nobody seems to remember that the prime accuser of
Julian Assange ? Anna Ardin in Sweden ? used to work for extreme anti-
Castro publications funded by the CIA. So there are links there, and it
doesn?t require a conspiratorial attitude to see that the only way they
can get at Julian Assange is by trumped-up charges of sexual
indiscretions in a country that is hypersensitive to that, and they
haven?t even persuaded a judge in Sweden to make those charges.

They have had ample opportunity to go to the Ecuadorian Embassy in
London and question Julian Assange. They said, ?we?re not going to do
that.' Now, why is that? The reason is, there is no case against Julian
Assange. In my opinion, it?s all very transparent. They want to
extradite him to Sweden, and then to the United States to suffer the
same indignities, the same torture of Bradley Manning ? the person who
allegedly gave those documents to Julian Assange ? has faced. This is a
violation of the First Amendment in our country and other amendments in
our Bill of Rights, and I dare say that our founding fathers are
rolling in their graves to see a [publisher] treated this way in
violation of the right to make things known that are otherwise hidden.

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤