BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:
Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:27:32 -0500
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Some antenna theory elmering needed again
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<F1274DDAA7ED4C9786EC856117414FAB@owner454d9914d>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Tom Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
That's my plan, Howard.

I'm going to get on the air both with and without the extra feed line, and 
see what happens.

I guess if the auto-tuner tunes it, that's what I have to be most concerned 
with at least while I'm experimenting.

Perhaps I'm being a bit over cautious, but I don't want to risk harming 
anything.

Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Some antenna theory elmering needed again


> I'd be tempted to try a non-resonant feedline length, but before that, I'd
> get on 75 and 80 meters and see how it works.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2