BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:41:06 -0400
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<03.98.03320.39632505@louvi-msg>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
that is grotesquely stupid to cut their funding.  maybe you would prefer bookshare that you have to pay for and has tons of errors?

On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Robert C <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 	I just love this one..
> 
> "...maybe we should lobby congress tocut their funding budget and let 
> them know that we mean business it is about time that we did."
> 
> 	Cut off your nose to spite your face. LOL
> 
> Quote of the nanosecond . . .
> I'm not tense, just terribly, terribly alert....
> Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
> E-mail-
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> On 9/13/2012 6:47 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>> maybe we should lobby congress
>> tocut their funding budget and let them know that we mean business it is
>> about time that we did.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2