BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Martin G. McCormick" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:50:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
	I think one got a better spark emersed in hydrogen or
other gasses than air but I am not sure exactly about that.

Jim Gammon writes:
> Why in the world, or anywhere else, would they use Hydrogen in a chamber
> near a spark?

	One can certainly do that if you keep out the air or
oxygen, to be exact. Most gas stations have electric pumps
submerged in gasoline. There is no oxygen to ignite the gas so
the motor could short out and or heat up and nothing much more
than that would happen as long as the gasoline level in the tank
didn't get so low that the motor was peeking out above the
liquid. That could be very bad news.

  And, regarding audio fidelity back then, don't forget those
> good old carbon mic's!  Jim WA6EKS

	I think that Fessendon's voice transmitter actually
connected a carbon mike between the output of the generator and
the antenna.

	Remember that no amplifiers existed back then and people
were trying anything they could do backin those days and some of
it was flat crazy by our standards but it sort of worked.

Martin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2