BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert C <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:59:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
	For someone who has been a ham (?) for 35 years, all this nonsense is 
way overdue for an ending.

	Rather than feed the fire, this list would do well to stop feeding 
Harry. This nonsense has no intrinsic value to a ham radio list. Its 
more than unproductive.

	Those who have put much time and effort into attempting to help Harry 
need to accept this as a lost cause. Its gone on far too long.

Quote of the nanosecond...
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
  --Steven Wright
Robert & Dreamer Doll  ke7nwn
E-mail-
[log in to unmask]
Home Page-
http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/

On 8/16/2012 10:10 AM, Colin McDonald wrote:
> oh give me a break.
> this is absolutely rediculous.
> I won't apologize for stating the obvious.
> And i won't pander to your bullshit anymore either.  Even if you have some
> kind of mental disability, I'm not going to put up with this kind of garbage
> anymore.
> I've done my best to try and give you some pointed advice. all you do is get
> pissy and start demanding apologies from people who point out your behavior.
> Enough is enough already.
> I'm not going to be your enabler, and I'm not going to be your personal
> therapist either.
> This isn't a therapy list, it's a ham radio topic list.  If you get some
> sort of theraputic benefit out of ham radio, good for you, but leave that
> for some other list or for your professional shrink and leave us out of it.
> If you have valid questions, state them and someone else with more patients
> than me might still try to help you.
> I've done what I'm goign to do and that was far more than you were ever
> thankful for.
>
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 12:55 AM
> Subject: 2 things
>
>
>> Hi all,
>> Well, some hopeful news about my 120.
>> Tonight, I called my ham friend, Rick, wo8m, who lives here in the =
>> building. I asked if he could get on 20 phone, and I wanted to see if he =
>> could hear me. He said, "sure, glad to do it."
>> So, I got on, and he called me on a frequency, and folks, while I was on =
>> the telephone, when I answered his call, I heard myself on the rig, in =
>> great audio, and he said I was 40 over 9!
>> So, I just hope other stations will be able to hear me.
>> 2. Now, to Howard Coffman, and Colin, I demand an apology what you =
>> saying that I haven't taken any advice this list has given to me.
>> You guys have said that, but you both knew not some things, which it's =
>> not your fault that you didn't know these things, but it is your fault =
>> that you made such outrageous claims. What you both didn't know was, 2 =
>> weeks ago, I did call ham radio outlet, and I did ask about noise =
>> bridges, so, so much for you both saying I don't listen and take advice.
>> I absolutely rezent those comments, and I demand an apology.
>> 73,
>> Trippy, ac8s
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2