BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:14:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Hi there,
Well, I have my rights, and a right to my oppinion, and a right to be an activist.
I will never be silent.
Now as far as ARRL and qst, I'll be glad to sign a petition, or something, but I don't even read qst any more.
I'm also in agreement with Phil, the ARRL is a joke!
Trippy, ac8s
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Miller 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:23 PM
  Subject: Re: Man O Man


  You are the very reason it's that much harder for the rest of us, you and 
  those who think and act like you do. By the time someone wants to talk 
  rationally, one of you has already dug the hole so rather than starting from 
  ground level, the person who has the right approach and would be listened to 
  often has to dig out of a hole first and that's often harder than starting 
  from scratch because who ever you tried to talk to already had negative 
  thoughts they wouldn't have had  if it wasn't for that ranting raving 
  lunatic.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
  To: <[log in to unmask]>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:52 PM
  Subject: Re: Man O Man


  > Hi Anthony,
  > I won't do that.
  > Trippy, ac8s
  >
  >  ----- Original Message -----=20
  >  From: Anthony Vece=20
  >  To: [log in to unmask]
  >  Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 6:32 PM
  >  Subject: Re: Man O Man
  >
  >
  >  Hi Trippy or is it Tricky;
  >
  >  Why don't you just leave accessibility to diplomats.
  >
  >  You are only going to gum up the works and make bad for the rest of =
  > us.
  >
  >  73 de Anthony w2ajv
  >
  >
  >
  >  Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
  >
  >  On Mar 21, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]> =
  > wrote:
  >
  >  > Hi Butch,
  >  > I strongly agree with you on this one.
  >  > People build things with no thought to accessability, no thought at =
  > all.
  >  > Trippy, ac8s
  >  >  ----- Original Message -----=3D20
  >  >  From: Butch Bussen=3D20
  >  >  To: [log in to unmask]
  >  >  Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:44 PM
  >  >  Subject: Re: Man O Man
  >  >
  >  >
  >  >  (If this stuff was  designed from the ground up with accessibility =
  > in=3D20
  >  >  mind, it could easily be done these days.  Take for example the =3D
  >  > digital=3D20
  >  >  boxes we all were buying when TV went digital.  A talking chip =
  > could=3D20
  >  >  have easily and cheaply been added.  The problem with much of this =
  > =3D
  >  > stuff=3D20
  >  >  is no one gives a damn or even thinks of accessibility.  It really =
  > has =3D
  >  >
  >  >  nothing to do with entitlement.  Look what Kenwood does with =
  > their=3D20
  >  >  radios.
  >  >  73
  >  >  Butch
  >  >  WA0VJR
  >  >  Node 3148
  >  >  Wallace, ks.
  >  >
  >  >
  >  >  On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Steve wrote:
  >  >
  >  >> Yep, one of the byproducts of being such an entitlement society.
  >  >>
  >  >> Steve, K8SP
  >  >> ----- Original Message -----
  >  >> From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
  >  >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
  >  >> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:31 AM
  >  >> Subject: Man O Man
  >  >>
  >  >>
  >  >>> I really appreciate getting the service from Bard, Q S T and such =
  > =3D
  >  > and it is
  >  >>> always good trying for better but have you noticed, the more we =
  > get =3D
  >  > the
  >  >>> more
  >  >>> we want untill we sometimes are a pain in you know what.  73
  >  >>>   Ed   K7UC
  >  >>
  >  >>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2