BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 23:39:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
I know some people, you break down their door, you'll meet a gun on the 
other side of it, and someone who shoots first, asks questions later, but 
you won't be answering them.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: confrontation on the air? what do you all think about this 
topic?


> Trippy,
>
> Beyond reporting the problem to the appropriate officials, what else 
> should
> we do?  Do you really have an effective way to stop the practices you 
> don't
> like?  I'm not just saying "What the heck."  I just don't think I can do
> anything more effective than filing a written report.  I don't have any
> legal authority, and I'm certainly not going to go toe-to-toe with someone
> who has already demonstrated that he probably doesn't much care what other
> hams think.  The issue here is effective confrontation, not just
> confrontation for its own sake.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 13:14
> Subject: Re: confrontation on the air? what do you all think about this
> topic?
>
>
>> Hi Steve,
>> I won't do those things, because, if nothing works, and we just then =
>> avoid all the hams who are causing problems, and say, "what the heck, =
>> let someone else do it."
>> Not me, I'm not gonna wait for someone else to do it.
>> Thankfully, I'm not the only ham who feels this way.
>> Trippy, ac8s
>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>  From: Steve Dresser=20
>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>>  Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 9:56 PM
>>  Subject: Re: confrontation on the air? what do you all think about =
>> this topic?
>>
>>
>>  In my opinion, the kind of confrontation you described is just as bad =
>> as the=20
>>  offense itself.  How do we know that the guy really was a bootlegger?  =
>> Could=20
>>  it be that somebody was angry enough to just walk into his shack, grab =
>> the=20
>>  mic, and make that claim?  If I thought someone really was operating=20
>>  illegally, I'd try to contact him off the air to ask him to cease and=20
>>  desist, and if he seemed unwilling to do so, I'd report him in writing =
>> to=20
>>  either the ARRL or the FCC.  If neither of those organizations did =
>> anything=20
>>  about his operating practices, I'd just avoid him on the radio.
>>
>>  Steve
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>  From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
>>  To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>  Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 18:24
>>  Subject: confrontation on the air? what do you all think about this =
>> topic?
>>
>>
>>  > Hi all,
>>  > Since we've been talking about different ham radio lingo, etc.
>>  > I wanted to go another direction, and I want to know what you all =
>> think.
>>  > As you know, riley Hollingsworth, who was known for this cracking =
>> down =3D
>>  > on rule violaters on the air, isn't doing that any more, since he =
>> =3D
>>  > retired.
>>  > I remember the day when I read that, and I thought to myself, "what =
>> will =3D
>>  > we hams do now?"
>>  > Then, I read an article, that gave me the answer.
>>  > I don't remember where it was, whether in QST, or where it was, but =
>> it =3D
>>  > said something like this, "We hams will have to police the hobby, as =
>> the =3D
>>  > FCC won't have the resources to do it in the future."
>>  > I strongly agree with this article.
>>  > This is our hobby, and the FCC does indeed, not have the resources, =
>> and =3D
>>  > budget cuts will probably make this situation even worse.
>>  > So, how should we police ourselves on the air?
>>  > As a matter of fact, I heard about one way it was done, and I think =
>> it's =3D
>>  > pretty cool.
>>  > A local ham friend of myne was talking to a 4th call area station =
>> down =3D
>>  > in Georgia, and they were having a real enjoyable QSO, and all the =
>> =3D
>>  > sudden, my friend heard this big bang, noise. Another ham grabbed =
>> the =3D
>>  > microphone, and said "this station, ...., is a boot leg station, and =
>> =3D
>>  > will now be taken off the air."
>>  > My ham friend never heard this boot legger station again!
>>  > He said to me, "Trippy, I loved it, absolutely loved it, the hams in =
>> =3D
>>  > that community took matters into their own hands!"
>>  > So, what do you all think about this issue?
>>  > Trippy, ac8s
>>  >
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2