BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kolb <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:41:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (171 lines)
Thanks ed.  Helpful indeed.  Lou  WA3MIX
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: vanity call application process


>I got some good news for you if you can NOT find the call you are interes=
> ted
> in by going to the FCC website and searching the ULS database then that c=
> all
> was canceled and not in the system prior to the conversion to the ULS bac=
> k
> in August of 1999 and may very well be available so you may want to give =
> it
> a try also just in case if you have any other configuration of the call y=
> ou
> are interested in check those and see if they are available you may find =
> one
> of those available as well and get one of them if not the exact call you
> want unfortunately the site I like to use dose not give anything other th=
> an
> 1x2s and 2x1s but you can also check out radioqth.net I think it is =0D
> =0D
> I hope this helps=0D
> =0D
> Ed      W9JE =0D
> =0D
> =0D
> =0D
> =0D
> -------Original Message-------=0D
> =0D
> From: Lou Kolb=0D
> Date: 2/12/2012 12:13:12 PM=0D
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: vanity call application process=0D
> =0D
> Great!  I'd apreciate any light you could shed on the situation.  Thanks =
> for=0D
> your efforts.  Lou  WA3MIX=0D
> Lou Kolb=0D
> Voice-over Artist:=0D
> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations=0D
> Messages On-hold:=0D
> www.loukolb.com=0D
> ----- Original Message -----=0D
> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 1:01 PM=0D
> Subject: Re: vanity call application process=0D
> =0D
> =0D
>> Hmmmmmmmm now that is interesting I didn't know that it wasn't listed a=
> s=0D
>> active in the FCC database it might be available then but if not then y=
> ou=0D
>> would be wasting money if it wasn't available I will do some checking w=
> it=3D=0D
>> h=0D
>> another source I have and let you know what I found and from your email=
> I=0D
>> can kind of figure out what you are going after so let me check and see=
> w=3D=0D
>> hat=0D
>> I find=3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> 73 de W9JE      Ed =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> -------Original Message-------=3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> From: Lou Kolb=3D0D=0D
>> Date: 2/11/2012 4:15:43 PM=3D0D=0D
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: vanity call application process=3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> Thanks Ed.  Don't know why it's not in the data base but not listed on =
> th=3D=0D
>> at=3D0D=0D
>> site.  Other calls had dates listed as to when they would be available.=
>  =3D=0D
>> But=3D0D=0D
>> that's a good point about spending the money for a pointless applicatio=
> n.=3D=0D
>>  I=3D0D=0D
>> thought I could get rid of the A in my call but perhaps I'll just leave=
> w=3D=0D
>> ell=3D0D=0D
>> enough alone.  I just figured that since it wasn't listed as an active =
> ca=3D=0D
>> ll,=3D0D=0D
>> it might soon be available for assignment.  Thanks.  lou  WA3MIX=3D0D=0D
>> Lou Kolb=3D0D=0D
>> Voice-over Artist:=3D0D=0D
>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations=3D0D=0D
>> Messages On-hold:=3D0D=0D
>> www.loukolb.com=3D0D=0D
>> ----- Original Message -----=3D0D=0D
>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>=3D0D=0D
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=3D0D=0D
>> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 3:10 PM=3D0D=0D
>> Subject: Re: vanity call application process=3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>> =3D0D=0D
>>> Hey Lou =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> When I applied for mine I went to the site you mentioned and found it =
> t=3D=0D
>> he=3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> re=3D0D=0D
>>> so if it isn't listed it isn't available if you apply for it and it is=
> n=3D=0D
>> 't=3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> in=3D0D=0D
>>> the database your application will be rejected so don't waste the mone=
> y=3D=0D
>> y=3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> ou=3D0D=0D
>>> won't get it back=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Ed      W9JE =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> -------Original Message-------=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> From: Lou Kolb=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Date: 2/10/2012 8:46:29 PM=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: vanity call application process=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> I'm interested in applying for a vanity call.  It's not listed in the =
> d=3D=0D
>> at=3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> a=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> base but does that necessarily mean it's available.   I've looked on=3D=
> 0D=0D
>>> the=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> N4MC site and can't find it listed among the available call signs.  I =
> s=3D=0D
>> ee=3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> there is provision for 25 call sign possibilities and you list yours i=
> n=3D=0D
>> =3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> order of preference.  However, I'm only interested in one call sign.  =
> I=3D=0D
>> f =3D3D=3D0D=0D
>>> I=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> can't get that,I'd like to just keep what I have.  Is this possible?=3D=
> 3D=3D=0D
>> 0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Thanks.  lou=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Lou Kolb=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Voice-over Artist:=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> Messages On-hold:=3D3D0D=3D0D=0D
>>> www.loukolb.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2