Unfortunately, that radio was popular before my time as a ham.
I had two ht's I should have never sold.
The Icom W2A and the Standard C558A along with there accessories.


Sent from my Verizon iPhone!

On Feb 3, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I still have the old 2AT that had the thumb wheels on top.  I have never had 
> trouble with that radio and it still gets used a lot.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 6:07 AM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
> 
> 
>> radioshack was the brand but it was actually a rebranded icom IC-02AT for
>> the most part.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>> 
>> 
>>> I am wondering about the brand?
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "PATRICK GORMLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:08 PM
>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie.  It just covers the two meter
>>>> band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa weather like
>>>> the
>>>> htx212 mobile rig can.
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> what is an HTX202?
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I preferred my
>>>>>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable with the
>>>>>> lo=
>>>>>> cal
>>>>>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time and fit 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> t=
>>>>>> he
>>>>>> hand better as well =0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> -------Original Message-------=0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> From: John Miller=0D
>>>>>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=0D
>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and sound. 
>>>>>> It
>>>>>> w=
>>>>>> as=0D
>>>>>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last as long
>>>>>> as=
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> they did.=0D
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>>>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=0D
>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated technology
>>>>>>> the=0D
>>>>>>> htx202=0D
>>>>>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld that will
>>>>>>> pu=
>>>>>> t=0D
>>>>>>> it=0D
>>>>>>> to shame though lol.=0D
>>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>> 73=0D
>>>>>>> Colin, V A6BS=0D
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>>>>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=0D
>>>>>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>>> Hi John,=0D
>>>>>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=0D
>>>>>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still have it?=0D
>>>>>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is a high
>>>>>>>> =3D=
>>>>>> =0D
>>>>>>>> demand for those!=0D
>>>>>>>> I had one and loved it!=0D
>>>>>>>> 73,=0D
>>>>>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>>>