BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
PATRICK GORMLEY <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 22:08:18 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie.  It just covers the two meter 
band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa weather like the 
htx212 mobile rig can.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202


> what is an HTX202?
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>
>
>>I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I preferred my
>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable with the 
>> lo=
>> cal
>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time and fit in 
>> t=
>> he
>> hand better as well =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>> -------Original Message-------=0D
>> =0D
>> From: John Miller=0D
>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=0D
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>> =0D
>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and sound. It 
>> w=
>> as=0D
>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last as long 
>> as=
>> =0D
>> they did.=0D
>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=0D
>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=0D
>> =0D
>> =0D
>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated technology the=0D
>>> htx202=0D
>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld that will pu=
>> t=0D
>>> it=0D
>>> to shame though lol.=0D
>>>=0D
>>> 73=0D
>>> Colin, V A6BS=0D
>>> ----- Original Message -----=0D
>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=0D
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=0D
>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=0D
>>>=0D
>>>=0D
>>>> Hi John,=0D
>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=0D
>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still have it?=0D
>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is a high 
>>>> =3D=
>> =0D
>>>> demand for those!=0D
>>>> I had one and loved it!=0D
>>>> 73,=0D
>>>> Trippy, ac8s
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2