Are you sure that won't work?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angelo Sonnesso" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 9:27 AM
Subject: programming cable for the HTX420
>I figured I better change the subject field.
> Any ideas where I can get a programming cable?
> I have an Alinco cable, but it is a single pin cable.
> It is brand new if anyone needs one, I will give it to you.
> Angelo Sonnesso N2DYN
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Buddy Brannan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:06 PM
> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>
>
>> LOL, I heard it was Maxon that made them for the Shaft, although they =
>> used icon O2AT accessories. I don't think it was Standard, although =
>> rumor was that the dual band they had for a short time was Standard, =
>> although it was most likely ADI. Remember ADI?
>> --
>> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Anthony Vece wrote:
>>
>>> They were Standard radios.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
>>>=20
>>> On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:42 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> No, the HTX-420, and that series of radios, I forget who made them =
>> but it=3D20=3D
>>>=20
>>>> wasn't Icom, I believe GRE actually made them for radioshack.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>> From: "Angelo Sonnesso" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:23 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>> =3D20
>>>> =3D20
>>>>> Hay John,
>>>>> Do you think the HTX420 is a re branded Icom?
>>>>> The HTX420 is a dual band handheld.
>>>>> =3D20
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:07 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>> =3D20
>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>> radioshack was the brand but it was actually a rebranded icom =
>> IC-02AT fo=3D
>>> r
>>>>>> the most part.
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:44 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>> I am wondering about the brand?
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>> From: "PATRICK GORMLEY" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:08 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>> Jerry an htx202 is a 2-meter handi talkie. It just covers the =
>> two=3D20
>>>>>>>> meter
>>>>>>>> band and can't receive anything above the band such as noaa =
>> weather=3D20=3D
>>>=20
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> htx212 mobile rig can.
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>>> From: "Gerry Leary" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 9:29 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>> what is an HTX202?
>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>>>>>>>>> From: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:43 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202
>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>>>>>>>>>> I had one of those as well and while it was an ok radio I =
>> preferred m=3D
>>> y
>>>>>>>>>> Alinco dual banders over the htx202 they were more compatable =
>> with=3D20=3D
>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> lo=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> cal
>>>>>>>>>> repeaters that were in the area I was living in at that time =
>> and fit=3D
>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> t=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>>>> hand better as well =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> -------Original Message-------=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> From: John Miller=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 2/1/2012 8:12:05 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> Personally I think the HTX-202 was much better in quality and =
>> sound.=3D
>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>> w=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> as=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> a little big, but I'd doubt if anything out of china will last =
>> as=3D20=3D
>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>>> as=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> they did.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 6:41 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> yeh, I guess if you like boat anchors, and antiquated =
>> technology
>>>>>>>>>>> the=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> htx202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> is great...i've got a 38 dollar chinese dual band handheld =
>> that wil=3D
>>> l
>>>>>>>>>>> pu=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> t=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> it=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> to shame though lol.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> 73=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Colin, V A6BS=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:11 PM=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: John Millers htx 202=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi John,=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just trying to get caught up on blind-hams archives.=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> A year ago, you mentioned you had the htx 202, you still =
>> have=3D20
>>>>>>>>>>>> it?=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt you do, because, well, what a great ht, and there is =
>> a hig=3D
>>> h
>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3D=3D3D
>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for those!=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> I had one and loved it!=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> 73,=3D3D0D
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>>>>>>> =3D20
|
