Well, I have no problem with Creationism  variants which do not conflict with Palaeolithic Diet theory -although I think they are a cop-out, since, if religion were true, one would naturally expect a literal interpretation of the Bible in line with Bishop Usher's analysis. But even then, in line with standard forum rules, religion and politics should not be mentioned here anyway, with occasional, relevant exceptions, such as my past post re Ron Paul, which was highly relevant to the concept of palaeolithic diets.

Geoff