Lou is correct.I didn't know it was used on HF either,  until I read the
article in May QST. It certainly seems promising. It makes me wonder about
the differences between JT65 and JT65-HF. The software author says it is
JT65 tweaked for use on HF, but doesn't go into details.

I'll play around with this sometime this week and let you all know what I
discover.
--Doug, AC7T

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Lou Kolb
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 11:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?

Jt65 is like psk31 in that it's another digital mode.  I've never had any
experience with it but the word is it can detect signals inaudible to the
human ear.  Signals that are well below the noise level.  I hadn't known
that there was an HF version of it.  Usually, it's used on VHF for moon
bounce work.
Lou Kolb
Voice-over Artist:
Radio/TV Ads, Video narrations
Messages On-hold:
www.loukolb.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Any Success using JT65-HF?


> Hi Doug,
> What is Jt-65?
> Is that like psk31?
> They say with psk31, even the weakest stations are heard!
> Trippy, ac8s
>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>  From: Doug Payne=20
>  To: [log in to unmask]
>  Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2012 10:49 PM
>  Subject: Any Success using JT65-HF?
>
>
>  Hi Fellow-Listers,
>
>  =20
>
>  Have any of you had success using the JT65-HF software? I just read a 
> = short  article about this mode in May 2012 QST, and it sounds like I 
> may be = able to  use this mode effectively, even with my modest HF 
> setup. Of course, = that  depends on the accessibilty of the software, 
> among other things. I am  interested in hearing your experiences. 
> Thanks.
>
>  =20
>
>  --Doug, AC7T