BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Howard Traxler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Howard Traxler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:04:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I think the complaint is when someone might put an s after 73.  Get the 
radio police!
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harvey Heagy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: License Renewal?


> Although 73 is mainly used when a ham is actually on the air, it is a
> legitimate ham greeting, not CB.
> Harvey
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Harry Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:38 PM
> Subject: Re: License Renewal?
>
>
>> HI all,
>> Please, can we stop with the 73's?
>> We're suppose to be hams here, not chicken banders.
>> I'm not alone, when it comes to that, either.
>> A very well known ham, nationally, has this pet peeve as well, and I =
>> also do.
>> This is not cb, this is ham radio, and if you're gonna be a ham, talk =
>> the talk!
>> 73,
>> Trippy, ac8s 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2