BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Vernaleken <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:59:17 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I think it is time to say enough already and let this end.

John


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Scott Howell
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: man? oh man?

Richard I'm not sure I entirely agree with you on some points, but one =
thing we can agree on is the fact that this thread has gone so far off =
topic. I'm actually pretty disappointed in a number of comments and = other
nonsense that has come out of the threads on this list as a result = of what
I thought was a reasonable discussion. I do apologize for even = initiating
the discussion and I certainly will reframe from ever = bringing up such on
this list because it is very apparent that having = the conversation is
almost impossible.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2