BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:46:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Thanks very much.  This is getting somewhere and they are listening and very 
concerned.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Man O Man


> Hi Gerry;
>
> Keep up the good work.
>
> 73 de Anthony w2ajv
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
>
> On Mar 21, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Gerry Leary <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,  I really am working with them directly to do this.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: Man O Man
>>
>>
>>> Hi Trippy or is it Tricky;
>>>
>>> Why don't you just leave accessibility to diplomats.
>>>
>>> You are only going to gum up the works and make bad for the rest of us.
>>>
>>> 73 de Anthony w2ajv
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Verizon iPhone!
>>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Harry Brown <[log in to unmask]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Butch,
>>>> I strongly agree with you on this one.
>>>> People build things with no thought to accessability, no thought at 
>>>> all.
>>>> Trippy, ac8s
>>>> ----- Original Message -----=20
>>>> From: Butch Bussen=20
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:44 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Man O Man
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (If this stuff was  designed from the ground up with accessibility 
>>>> in=20
>>>> mind, it could easily be done these days.  Take for example the =
>>>> digital=20
>>>> boxes we all were buying when TV went digital.  A talking chip could=20
>>>> have easily and cheaply been added.  The problem with much of this =
>>>> stuff=20
>>>> is no one gives a damn or even thinks of accessibility.  It really has 
>>>> =
>>>>
>>>> nothing to do with entitlement.  Look what Kenwood does with their=20
>>>> radios.
>>>> 73
>>>> Butch
>>>> WA0VJR
>>>> Node 3148
>>>> Wallace, ks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Steve wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep, one of the byproducts of being such an entitlement society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve, K8SP
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Ed Malmgren" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:31 AM
>>>>> Subject: Man O Man
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I really appreciate getting the service from Bard, Q S T and such =
>>>> and it is
>>>>>> always good trying for better but have you noticed, the more we get =
>>>> the
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> we want untill we sometimes are a pain in you know what.  73
>>>>>>  Ed   K7UC
>>>>>
>>>>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2