BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Albert Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:14:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
No it is not.
Albert WA7FXB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: Regarding Digital QST Accessibility


> Speaking of such things, is their repeater directory on cd accessible? 
> It didn't use to be, and when I asked about it, I got nowhere.
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 20 
> Mar 2012, Mike Duke, K5XU wrote:
> 
>> Before we burn down the neighborhood with this bonfire, let's at least
>> roast the hotdog.
>>
>> The question of how many of us are ARRL members is quite relevant to
>> this discussion, but I don't see people lining up to answer it.
>>
>> I am a member on the family rate with my wife, K5KKD. Thus, we receive
>> one issue of QST each month, usually from 6 to 8 weeks ahead of the
>> NLS download or cassette.
>>
>> Those of us who are ARRL members must, by all means, write to the
>> members of the ARRL Board of Directors, to tell them that as paying
>> members, we expect the digital edition to be accessible to us when it
>> is rolled out. We should also volunteer to work with them to make this
>> happen.
>>
>> While I suspect he has little to do with the digital edition directly,
>> a copy of our letters should also be sent to QST Editor Steve Ford,
>> just to let him know we are out here, and that we are serious readers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Duke, K5XU
>> American Council of Blind Radio Amateurs
>>
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2