Hi Steve and the group,
Well, I did a search and didn't come up with anything but old versions of digitalk.
Maybe I should ask the question in a different way.
Is anyone using any of the digital modes. If so, how are you doing it? I don't have jaws or windoweyes. I am currently running nvda with windows 7.
This isn't an emergency or anything, just an interest of mine.
73s,
Clarence
On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Steve Forst wrote:
> Clarence,
>
> To the best of my knowledge the latest version of Digitalk is not a
> stand alone program. It's been a few months since I looked into it, but
> it was designed to work with either the fldigi or the multipsk programs.
> I think there is some work being done on this, but at the time, I
> couldn't make heads or tails out of either program with jaws. Sorry I
> don't have any links handy for this stuff, but a google search should
> kick up something.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
>
> On 2/14/2012 2:45 PM, Clarence Williamson wrote:
>> This question concers the new version of digitalk. Does it work with =
>> windows 7 and if so, where can I get it. =20
>> 73s,
>> Clarence
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Steve Forst wrote:
>>
>>> Gary,
>>> =20
>>> Tom has a couple of different issues going. One of which is the N3FJP=20=
>>
>>> logger he is using not being able to access a sound device other than=20=
>>
>>> the default device and so the .wav files for navigating the fields=20
>>> aren't working.
>>> =20
>>> The other issue is his not being able to send packet. I think this is=20=
>>
>>> going to come down to telling whatever software he is using to use =
>> the=20
>>> Signal Link and to be sure ptt is set correctly. The Signal Link has=20=
>>
>>> that vox circuit.
>>> =20
>>> I don't see why the fldigi won't work with both the signal link and =
>> jaws.
>>> =20
>>> BTW, have you had any success with fldigi? I looked at it a few =
>> months=20
>>> ago and couldn't make much sense out of it. I know there is an =
>> updated=20
>>> version of Digitalk that is supposed to work in conjunction =
>> withfldigi,=20
>>> but I couldn't get anywhere with flidigi.
>>> =20
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>> On 2/14/2012 10:16 AM, Gary Tillinghast wrote:
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>> When using the Signal Link for FLDIGI, due you think there would be =
>> the =3D
>>>> same kind of a problem that Tom Has? Gary KB2YAA
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>>> =20
>>
>>
>>
|
