Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:01:19 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
remote tuners at the feed point are great. I did that with my statinbefore the lighting strike that took out my auto tuner. I had a remote balunn and tuner mounted atthe point where the ladder line came to the house down fromthe dipole, and then coax into the shack and to the rig itwas a relaly nice way to run
good luck and 73
kb7nla
On Dec 13, 2011, at 6:42 AM, Howard Kaufman wrote:
> I guess the theory is that on 20 it is a bit long for resonance, which now
> looks like a 3/8 wave. Any antenna used on multiple bands will work
> differently on each band.
> I am trying to understand at what point the SWR drastically effects the
> efficiency of the vertical. The variables seem to be reflected power and
> transmitter shut back when it sees the reflected power. That can be
> eliminated with a tuner, but I don't know if doing that actually delivers
> more signal to the antenna or not. Working with shielded line and a tuner
> is new to me.
> I am going to try a remote automatic tuner at the base of the antenna. That
> sounds like the best way to go for efficient multi-band operation. I think
> that with coax, the tuned reflected power probably warms the coax rather
> than is radiated by the vertical. It looks like stretching the efficient
> use of the antenna from 17 meters to 29.2 for A.M. Phone is asking a lot,
> which makes sense to me.
|
|
|